User talk:Thunderbolt16

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~

Dori 23:15, Nov 20, 2003 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome! Thunderbolt16 23:17, Nov 20, 2003 (UTC)

I wikified my tutorial (mostly, still need to add links from \ref's), and put it at: [1]. Hopefully, that should make it easyier for you to continue to incorporate it into Programming Python on Wikibooks. Jrincayc 13:11, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Thank you very much, I've been neglecting wikibooks recently, this will help a lot Thunderbolt16 03:48, Jun 3, 2004 (UTC)

Creative Commons

Hey, just wanted to let you know that you can use the {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} template on your user page to update your Creative Commons license to include version 2.0 as well as version 1.0. -- Ram-Man 03:33, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the info, I just updated my user page. Thunderbolt16 23:52, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)

Education in the United States NPOV dispute

I agree with your assessment. I changed quite a bit of wording. Would you care to express your opinion? And if you still think it's POV, would you like to offer some corrections yourself? Thanks, --User:naryathegreat (t) 23:06, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

Great job! I also made a few additions and changes to wordings about community colleges. I'd be glad if you looked them over. Thunderbolt16 01:11, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)

I think it looks good now, would you be willing to remove the POV dispute notice?--User:naryathegreat (t) 02:22, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)

Done Thunderbolt16 02:25, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)

Re: Montessori Article

I was disturbed by the fact that the entire Montessori_Method article is unreferenced. I notice that you have made many edits to this article and others, so with due respect I ask you for opinions/advice.

I also noticed that one of the early authors of the page used information copied with permission from Montessorimom.com and this seems suspect. I am a product of, and believer in, these schools and their philosophies, and I see that the founder of Wikipedia is also, but this article seems biased even to me.

You've gone to considerable lengths to improve this article, but why bother if its original authors are biased and do not cite their sources?

I added the Reference tag to the top of the article for this reason. I hope that this will help. Please advise- thank you. --Merryjman

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]