Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Meredith Allen
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. I'll redirect it. dbenbenn | talk 15:31, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Carl Meredith Allen[edit]
| Redirect | Delete |
|---|---|
| 2 | 3 |
Poorly written and uninformative. Is this the type of material we want housed on Wikipedia? Is this best kept, deleted, or redirected? GRider\talk 18:56, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Uninformative article about a small-time crank who may or may not actually exist. --Carnildo 20:52, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete unless somethign of significance can be added. Agree with Carnildo. -R. fiend 21:17, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable. Jayjg (talk) 21:55, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Philadelphia Experiment. --Viriditas | Talk 04:46, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Philadelphia Experiment. Megan1967 07:56, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Save. I'm the primary author for the Philadelphia Experiment article, and I have more information on Carl M. Allen which I could use to expand the article to about three paragraphs or so, including place of birth, family history, and such. If I added this - which I can do this week - would that be enough to save it? - Scooter 20:52, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Is he notable for anything other than originating the Philadelphia Experiment? --Carnildo 01:33, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.