Jump to content

Talk:Military technology during World War I

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

From WP:RfD:


This article was not about all military technology of 1914-1918, but only about the changes in it (thus the word "during"). Certainly it's fair to get rid of the questionable word "advancement" in the title although it has some sarcastic value, but the replacement would be "escalation", making the title "technological escalation during World War I" (and another on technological escalation during World War II") more correctly describe this. Then the title "military technology" could refer only to the actual hardware, describing it in detail, which this article does not, and should not.

Three levels of abstraction are appropriate here: the grand strategy and diplomacy of the wars, which is history more or less, the military science and technology that did not obviously drive events (when they do, lay out the history here by all means) but had from time to time huge tactical impacts, and the equipment and tactics that were actually used by real people to do real things (like kill people). Trying to mix the levels seems like a bad idea, as they each need a separate treatment with reference to quite different things. I wouldn't want, for instance, to read a detailed analysis of the German vs. British rifle designs in the article on technological escalation, but I *would* want that in one on the war equipment and tactics.

There will be overlap, but it's manageable, since it's fairly obvious when an historical level event really was altered by science and technology (like Hiroshima and Nagasaki which at least was a major factor in choosing the endpoint of the war). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.177.114.34 (talkcontribs) 16:46, 24 September 2003