User talk:BushIsEvil2

Please pick another name- it'll only end up being trouble for you. I made a couple suggestions and notes on your old talk page. If you're not comfortable with using your real name, do you have another internet pseudonym you can use? -[[User:Frazzydee|Frazzydee|✍]] 23:39, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I know that in all likelyhood you're not just a common troll or anything. In fact, my views on George Bush are the same as yours- I don't like him. But Wikipedia aims to create an encyclopedia, and political views MUST be kept separate. I know that it's just a name- and I can see where you're coming from- but if your new accounts are just as inflammatory as previous ones, it'll just end up getting blocked again. -[[User:Frazzydee|Frazzydee|✍]] 23:42, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I agree that politicians should be made fun of. But not here. Vandalism is reverted within minutes. You are hardly repaying my unblocking by loggin in under this username and threatening to vandalise Wikipedia. Calling your user namre unnaceptable is not a personal attack. There are plenty of liberals on this site. Theresa Knott (Nate the Stork) 23:44, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

While I agree you will make things easier for yourself and your purposes by changing your name, I think you should be allowed to have whatever name you heart desires. LegCircus 00:04, Sep 4, 2004 (UTC)

Never the less we have a very clear policy on this. Offensive usernames are not allowed. Theresa Knott (Nate the Stork) 00:16, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Wikipedia does not shut out Liberal ideas. If somebody created a username KerryisEvil or Kerryisapig (which I'm temped to do just to make my point) and called a liberal a faggot, there's high chance that I'd be banned. Aside from policy, I urge you to get another name because you can only have respect from half the community with a name that insults the other half's beliefs. Unless you're planning not to be a valuable contributor... — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 04:38, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)