Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Witten

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Rossami (talk) 01:34, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Witten[edit]

Unless there's a lot more to say about him, I vote for deletion. Deb 17:42, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I've added some more. ~~Not sure whether it's enough to make him notable, but I think so. No vote yet.~~ —msh210 17:54, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. More-notable-than-average professor-physicist. A proceedings was published in his honor, after all. —msh210 03:09, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep according to Msh's assessment. Kappa 09:31, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. Seems to have had a fairly lengthy career and having a proceedings named after you is some evidence of notability within the profession. Capitalistroadster 09:55, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jeremy P Lewis
- This is JPL's 2nd edit. Seems authentic, though. —msh210 02:20, 6 May 2005 (UTC). (To JPL: Don't be offended by this analysis. Newbies to Wikipedia often have their votes discounted simply because one doesn't know whether they're sock puppets. However, as I just wrote, you seem "authentic" — not like a sock puppet. (This is true both because your 1st edit — about wholism — seems well-reasoned and because this VFD discussion is not controversial.) —msh210 02:20, 6 May 2005 (UTC))[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.