Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poetree

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 23:53, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

Poetree

Non-notable. Google search (5th result) [1] --Barfooz (talk) 01:24, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect -- to poetry. Possible mispelling. - Longhair | Talk 01:25, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Why would we redirect an uncommon misspelling? There are 6,844 times more results for "poetry" on Google than "poetree" and we shouldn't make redirects for misspellings at all in my opinion --Barfooz (talk) 04:28, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn. Would you suggest we redirect every possible misspelling of everything, Longhair? --Xcali 06:07, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Probable or common misspellings have been acceptable redirects for a very long time. That said, my vote is to delete this highly unlikely spelling. Denni☯ 00:50, 2005 Jun 4 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. No redirect. --bainer (talk) 09:02, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, no redirect. — Phil Welch 23:25, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - no redirect - Tεxτurε 18:09, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.