Talk:Chiniquodon

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animals Low‑importance

Chiniquodon is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

(This information has been derived from [1] TRIASSIC CYNODONTS; Cynognathidae, Probainognathidae and ‘Allies’, an internet directory. As that's my webpage, there are no issues of copyright. Trevor Dykes)

Merge proposal: Probelesodon[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was merge. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 23:17, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The genus Probelesodon was synonymised with Chiniquodon by Abdala & Giannini (2002), and later papers such as Martínez et al. (2013), Martinelli et al. (2017) and Mocke et al. (2019) have generally accepted this synonymy. A few days ago, I merged the two articles, but this was reverted with no explanation. Do you think they should be merged? —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 21:28, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnatyrannus: do you have input? --awkwafaba (📥) 12:24, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Id like to keep them as separate genera. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magnatyrannus (talk • contribs) 21:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnatyrannus: But the scientific consensus is to treat them as synonyms. "Id like to keep them as separate genera" is not a valid argument; you must provide sources for your viewpoint. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 23:54, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Awkwafaba: It's been a week, and no good arguments have been made against merging the pages. What should I do? —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 21:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Trilletrollet: Magnatyrannus is frankly an incompetent editor. I suggest ignoring his opinion and just merging. You have my approval. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.