This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was speedy. – ABCD 01:15, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
There is a problem with the dash character in the title of this page; I've made a duplicate with the correct title and ensure that articles link to the right version
Article nominated for deletion by User:Rayray, its creator and sole editor, who also created Working Group for 14-19 Reform minutes later. Speedy delete under criterion G7. Note that the article's title reads "Working Group for 14–19 Reform" when displayed. Uncle G 18:34, 2005 Mar 11 (UTC)
I have Speedily deleted it as suggested by Uncle G. Just a technicality, nothing to vote. jni 18:39, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.