Talk:Lithic period in Mesoamerica

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica articles

Mexico

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of the Americas

	Indigenous peoples of the Americas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Should mention possible multiple waves of immigration. Rmhermen 01:16, Sep 30, 2004 (UTC)

Universally accepted?[edit]

"While it is universally accepted that the peopling of the Americas had occurred by c. 11,200 years ago..."

This to me seems to be highly POV, as Clovis' earliest dates go back 11,500 radiocarbon years (about 13,500 calendar years), and the new dates from Monte Verde are almost "universally accepted" among archaeologists. I'll take the initiative and make a very minor edit to make it seem less POV. Debate is welcome. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.90.55.99 (talk) 15:22, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added a citationneeded template to the edit; disputed facts should cite a reliable source. Agyle (talk) 07:58, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-projectile point horizon[edit]

¿huh? What is "a pre-projectile point horizon" ??? wtf? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.131.231.33 (talk) 21:09, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it should be clarified, but Googling "pre-projectile point horizon", in quotes, turned up explanations on the first page. Agyle (talk) 07:58, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]