Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The World's Biggest Gang Bang

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was

Some user with nothing but sex on his mind for the past few hours has made this article. Come on, do we really need articles on porn movies like this? The really notable porn movies like Debbie Does Dallas and Deep Throat I can see, but we have to draw the line somewhere and I am not looking forward to seeing a deluge of adult movie articles of questionable notability. Livajo 01:09, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Keep. It is the highest grossing movie ever in the porn industry. It caused a lot of furore both inside and outside the industry when it was first released. --SpaceMonkey 15:11, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Keep. And I think this movie is more notable than most porn movies. bbx 01:19, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
~~Weak Keep. I remember Howard Stern devoting a segment of his radio show to this movie. Sounded very unpleasant... [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 01:37, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)~~ Merge and redirect to Annablle Chong. Per comments below; we don't need separate articles about every film. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 10:56, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete: No, no, no. This is an Anabelle Chong fan who first tried to write about here and now has this. The thing about this is that I'm old enough and pornhound enough to remember at least three previous versions of this "record" on video. They do it pretty often. Aside from the degradation, this is, in fact, not notable. Within 10 months, some poor woman will have done 241 men. I don't want this door open. "Well, this porno film is notable because she does it with 12 men and three midgets" will be next. Geogre 02:24, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete as per Geogre's reasoning above. Fire Star 04:40, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Oh god. Put it out of its misery. Delete. Kairos 04:47, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:32, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Merge into Annabel Chong and redirect. Not notable enough for it's own article, but there is some small amount of content there that's not already in Annabel Chong. —Stormie 05:48, Sep 13, 2004 (UTC)
Merge into Annabel Chong and redirect. Jmabel 06:56, Sep 13, 2004 (UTC)
- BTW, I urge anyone with any interest in this to read at least one interview w/ Ms. Chong/Quek. She's no slouch intellectually. See for example [1] linked from our article on her. -- Jmabel 07:05, Sep 13, 2004 (UTC)
  - OK, I'll read it, but it sure sounds to me like the modern version of those 1950s Hollywood sex goddess who walked around with volumes of Proust to prove that they weren't just blonde bombshells... [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 10:56, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
    - A person who wants to be famous for having sloppy public sex with as many strangers as possible in a few hours isn't going to be on my list of geniuses any time soon. Fire Star 11:58, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
      - OK, I did like the quotation "I was in this strip club giving this guy a lap dance and all he wanted to do was to discuss Foucault with me. Well I can stand naked and do my little dance, or I can discuss Foucault, but not at the same time; too much information." But reminiscent of: "Zip! Walter Lippman wasn't brilliant today/Zip! Will Saroyan ever write a great play?/Zip! I was reading Schopenhauer last night/Zip! And I think that Schopenhauer was right." (Zip! by Rodgers and Hart) [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 23:22, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
        This is getting to be a bit much for VFD, so I'll stop after one more remark: she first came to my attention when I read this interview. -- Jmabel 23:55, Sep 13, 2004 (UTC)
Merge into Annabel Chong and redirect. CR 17:43, Sep 13, 2004 (UTC)
Merge into Annabel Chong and redirect. It appears to have some degree of notoriety, so, the information might be worth keeping. Andris 17:52, Sep 13, 2004 (UTC)
Keep as it is very notable. I hardly keep up with events in the word of porn (really! I swear!) and I have heard of this. It should also mention that the record was broken by the Houston 500. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel File:Watchmensmiley20.gif]] 02:00, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Ambi 09:05, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Informative, and it happened. - Ta bu shi da yu 13:49, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Keep - For reasons given above! -- Crevaner 15:41, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
We seem evenly divided among keep, merge, and delete. Can we compromise on merge? -- Jmabel 18:58, Sep 15, 2004 (UTC)
- For the sake of consensus, merge is fine with me. Fire Star 23:22, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Merge and redirect. -Sean Curtin 23:46, Sep 15, 2004 (UTC)
Keep. It might as well stay, there are other notable adult films with article in wikipedia. -- Old Right 22:56, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Keep. It was a fairly major event in the adult film industry. MK 15:49, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Merge into Annabel Chong and redirect. I agree, it was notable, (I'm not too ashamed to admit that I use to own it), but I think it is more appropriate as a redirect. func (talk) 01:36, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete, preferably, or merge/redir. Note that A) There's already also "World's Biggest Gang Bang 2" and "World's Biggest Gang Bang 3"--are we going to cover the whole series? B) "World's Biggest Gang Bang" chong -"chong story" gets less than 600 hits--fairly low for a porn flick--EG "Interview with a Vamp" asia gets almost 900, and "Chameleons Not the Sequel" ashlyn gets 2,500. Niteowlneils 00:51, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Keep. But the correct title is World's Biggest Gang Bang. Rick K 00:53, Sep 20, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.