Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lowel lane baker

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 17:32, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

Lowel lane baker[edit]

Student vanity. Article does not establish noteworthiness. Kelly Martin 23:38, May 22, 2005 (UTC)

speedy delete --Melaen 23:39, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
delete - not being able to speedy delete these things is what is making VFD impossible --Henrygb 23:44, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I quite agree that the narrowness of CSD is bogging VfD, but those criteria are narrow because of how few articles came in every day in the early days of Wikipedia. That said, any attempt at broadening CSD gets shouted down decisively, so we're at a lock. This isn't a speedy delete, unless one really pushed criterion #1. Just vanilla vanity. Geogre 03:05, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I consider speedying this article. I doubt any real harm would have come of it. Kelly Martin 06:34, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 06:28, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No encyclopedic content. Delete, candidate for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft 06:49, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Just delete -- Eagle 20:04, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
I concur, delete it Sdr 09:22, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.