Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conduct (IT company)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.

In my opinion, the dominant article for deletion is not the fact that the article is a stub nor that it sounds like advertising. The real reason for deletion is the lack of verifiable content. The only reference that anyone found during the extended discussion period was the company's own website - in Norwegian. The might be sufficient for the Norwegian Wikipedia but presents problems in the English version. Noting that no one came forward during the discussion period to translate or confirm any of the alleged facts, I am going to call this one a delete but without prejudice against re-creation if the author comes forward with more verifiable content. Rossami (talk) 00:32, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Conduct (IT company)

advertising Bengt Olav Olsen 07:50, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

Keep Notable company . Article needs to be edited though .--IncMan 14:50, May 20, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: Advertising as written. No way to assess if it could be otherwise from the state of the article now. Will check back toward the end of VfD voting to see if I can change my vote. Geogre 15:03, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, adv. --Marianocecowski 16:46, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.