Talk:Folklore

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Folklore article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Folklore Top‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Section sizes

Section size for Folklore (26 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	2,814	2,814
Overview	4,836	4,836
Origin and development of folklore studies	5,616	5,616
Definition of "folk"	3,909	3,909
Folklore genres	3,141	25,389
Verbal tradition	4,634	4,634
Material culture	6,007	6,007
Customs	5,919	5,919
Childlore and games	4,891	4,891
Folk history	797	797
Folklore performance in context	3,372	17,970
Backstory	2,330	2,330
Tradition-bearer and audience	2,615	2,615
Framing the performance	1,724	1,724
In the subjunctive voice	896	896
Anderson's law of auto-correction	2,375	2,375
Context of material lore	1,797	1,797
Toelken's conservative-dynamic continuum	1,710	1,710
In the electronic age	1,151	1,151
See also	434	434
Notes	31	31
References	35	10,529
Bibliography	10,494	10,494
Further reading	10,866	10,866
Further reading	169	169
External links	301	301
Total	82,864	82,864

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Hay#Loose hay stacking|Haystacks]] The anchor (#Loose hay stacking) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Requesting wider attention[edit]

I felt article Islamic_literature is in bit of neglect so I added my note on talk page there, requesting to take note of Talk:Islamic_literature#Article_review. If possible requesting copy edit support. Suggestions for suitable reference sources at Talk:Islamic_literature is also welcome.

Posting message here too for neutrality sake

Thanks and greetings

Bookku (talk) 08:03, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant[edit]

All too much of this article mirrors content in Folklore studies and seems to be less about the subject of Folklore itself than what folklorists think about it and its importance, starting with the "Overview". Some of this should be cut and the article focused more on the subject than those who study it. Manannan67 (talk) 21:31, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Manannan67: I tend to agree. On the whole, the article is far too long-winded and non-encyclopedic in style. I also object to the overuse of bold to pick out specific keywords, which is certainly not recommended – MOS:NOBOLD clearly states that italics are the preferred option. Rodney Baggins (talk) 21:47, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Massive recent change[edit]

Regine April B. Lausan made a sweeping-change edit [1], with an edit summary stating "I have added some customary lores, added some on the history of folk, added references for further reading and lastly paraphrased some." But this added no new sources at all, just two "External links" entries (one an organization homepage, the other a reading list; neither them are usable in the article as sources of any kind); removed a lot of sources and material cited to them; removed numerous citations while curiously leaving material reliant upon them alone otherwise; added a large number of claims and new lists (misformatted as blocks of one-line paragraphs) based on those claims, without any sources for any of it; and drastically changed the nature of several sections. The only kinda-constructive thing I can see in any of that was removing the unnecessarily detailed paragraph about Ireland in particular, which really doesn't belong in this article. Many of the new claims do not appear to be wrong on a cursory examination, but this is an encyclopedia, not someone's blog, and they don't get to just write what's on their mind without backing it up, much less also get to do violence to well-cited material already present.

If someone doesn't beat me to it, I'm of a mind to revert this completely, unless someone has good reasons not to (e.g. evidence that the removed sources were faulty) and is prepared to properly source everything added in the new version, and defend (one by one) the sourced statements that were deleted. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 23:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since no explanation or defense of these changes has been forthcoming I have reverted them [2]. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 22:08, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Who is Aladdin[edit]

Fully details 117.53.41.26 (talk) 07:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]