User talk:Mnadi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mo Elnadi UK

Internet & Information Architecture Consultant, well versed in the technologies and issues associated with developing, categorizing, publishing and managing information on the Web, content creation, Taxonomy, usability and management, traffic performance measurement methodology, web and network analytics.

Regional Editor at [dmoz.org] Regional Editor at [chefmoz.org] Regional Editor at [musicmoz.org]

You can reach me on mo.elnadi@gmail.com


Welcome!

Hello, Mnadi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Infrogmation 20:02, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Marco of Alexandria[edit]

Hello. The Marco of Alexandria page you created says the subject died in 1933, but the external link http://www.alexmarco.com/ seems to indicate he is still alive. Can you explain this apparent difference? Wondering, -- Infrogmation 20:06, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Sorry for the confusion from my part I removed the content after few seconds, as it was meant for another page and I pasted it by mistake.(Mo Nadi 16:34, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC))
In Fact Marco of Alexandria died in a Train Accident in Belgium Last July.

Musician Stubs[edit]

Hi Mnadi — I'm afraid you can't just create 20 articles containing nothing more than the {{stub}} tab — there has to be some content, however minimal. I'm currently putting {{del}} tags on them, but that's not because I don't think that the articles should exist. Rather, they need to have content to exist. If you plan on putting content on them, then do so. Articles without content, though, are ano good for anyone.

Thanks! — Asbestos | Talk 22:34, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Agree. It is considered bad form to start articles unless you have an absolute minimum of one full sentence explaining who the person is. Less than that may get deleted, or at least are considered a problem. Please take time looking at the Wikipedia:Manual of Style and related links. Hope this helps, -- Infrogmation 00:31, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the hint, I can see your point. Yes I am working on updating these page as my time allows, after all we are all busy professionals with other life obligations. My intention was to allow others to know these new pages are there so they can start editing them too. (Mo Nadi 16:26, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC))

Hi! Your articles should also be longer than "Born 1931."  :^) That's a speedy deletion candidate for sure. - Lucky 6.9 19:20, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I've already added much more information during the past days, so no need for speedy assumptions :-) (Mo Nadi 21:53, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC))

Redirect pages[edit]

Hi. You can create redirect pages by typing #REDIRECT [[name_of_page]]. I have redirected Souad Hosni and Soad Hosny to Suad Husni. utcursch 14:45, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks Utcursch that was a quite usefull tip. I didn't know that. Mo Nadi 21:14, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Muslim Guild[edit]

Hi, you may want to join the |Muslim Guild. freestylefrappe 20:46, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding that link[edit]

We had a problem with the Islam article -- the links section was growing like cancer, as dozens of Islamic websites were linking themselves. We ended up just giving a link to the dmoz directory and outlawing any but academic links. Your site should be in dmoz. We can't give special treatment to your site. If we let you list, then every other Islamic website is entitled to list too. Please respect that. Zora 11:27, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bill-Morrow.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 03:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing that, the image was taken from a Vodafone media and marketing kit. I've fixed the tags. Mo Nadi 22:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Egyptian people[edit]

Hi, I noticed you've recently added some pages to Category:Egyptian people. Would you please review my note at the top of the Category's main page and the discussion at its talk page?--Wedian 12:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I undestand that you created this article and have contributed most of the information. so if you don't mind, please provide references for the article. Shukran --Inahet 17:19, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sir-Julian-Horn-Smith.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sir-Julian-Horn-Smith.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok 00:40, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also Image:Thomas-Geitner.jpg. —Chowbok 03:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


hello i wish u can write in arabic wikipedia because it suffer from low number of articles --Mmustafa 14:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kurów on Egyptian Arabic[edit]

Could you please write a stub about Kurów on Egyptian Arabic here - just a few sentences based on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kur%C3%B3w ? Only 3-5 sentences enough. Please.

PS. Article about Kurów is already on 156 languages. If your village/town/city hasn't on PL wiki, I can do article about it. Pietras1988 TALK 16:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Arun-Sarin.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Arun-Sarin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Sherihan[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sherihan, by Barsportsunlimited, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sherihan seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sherihan, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Sherihan itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lord-MacLaurin.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lord-MacLaurin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Philips has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. treelo talk 11:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Treelo, I appreciate your help but I am the owner of the Philips sites in UK, Ireland and South Africa and we do have lots of requests for such a UK map which I belive will add value to the wikipedia users who would like to find our company physically! I appreciate your trying to help and your personal opinion that it is unconstructive, but I see no point of removing it promptly everytime we try to do some edits to this public page !

Could you please explain your reactions on the Philips page?

Replaceable fair use Image:Paul-Donovan.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Paul-Donovan.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 15:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:JulianHorn-Smith.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:JulianHorn-Smith.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 15:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Peter-Bamford.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Peter-Bamford.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 15:47, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Paul-Hazen.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Paul-Hazen.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 15:47, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lotfia ElNadi[edit]

I noticed that you contributed a significant amount of detail to the article on her, based on info "obtained from family members" (according to the edit summary). She sounds like a very interesting woman - are there independent sources that verify the facts of the article on her? WP runs on published sources from non-involved people, much more than personal anecdotes from family... -- Jaeger5432 | Talk 03:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Mnadi! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 1,643 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Nabila Ebeid - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Farkhonda Hassan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Peter Bamford - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Bill Morrow (executive) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Paul Donovan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Paul Hazen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Eman Ghoneim - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Frank Rovekamp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:BIO (a CMO among many) and has been tagged for almost 2 yrs.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jt (talk) 22:05, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Civica logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Civica logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on ElNadi family, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

unremarkable family

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WWGB (talk) 11:50, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article ElNadi family has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, no reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yunshui  12:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Call for Wikipedians in Residence in Africa[edit]

Hello,

I hope you are well and thriving!! WikiAfrica has just put out a call for two Wikipedians in Residence. One in Cape Town at WikiAfrica, at the Africa Centre; and the other for WikiAfrica Cameroon in Douala, at doual’art. If you are interested, please contact either Marilyn [marilyn.doualabell@doualart.org] for the WikiAfrica Cameroon call or Isla [islahf@africacentre.net] for the WikiAfrica position in Cape Town.

If you are not interested in applying, I would be very grateful if you could spread this call far and wide among your networks to ensure that both projects get excellent candidates. Here is the link for the information page: http://www.wikiafrica.net/two-wikipedians-in-residence-for-africa/

Best regards, Islahaddow

(This message was sent using Lucia Bot at 22:28, 16 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Request for Help, please[edit]

Greetings Mr Mnadi,


Nice to meet you.

Could you kindly help me translate this article into the Romanized Egyptian Arabic language? Please.


Your help would be very Gratefully Appreciated, Thankyou very much. --Philip J (talk) 22:41, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Mnadi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Hazen Article[edit]

The article Paul Hazen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article does not meet notability guidelines. Extensive search and unable to find additional citations to verify article contents.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. L0calh0$t (talk) 12:49, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Mnadi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SafeToNet Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Aspening (talk) 22:02, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]