Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dracology

Dracology

Dracology returns 200 hits on Google, some of which from Wikipedia mirrors. No pages link to it. As far as I can tell, it is not used in any notable fantasy series. I has received no more than six edits since it was created eight months ago, and has been listed on the 'dead-end pages' for at least five months. In my opinion, this article will not be encyclopedic. Its apparent lack of notable fantasy usage is an indication that it is probably irrelevant as well. →Iñgōlemo← (talk) 03:32, 2005 Jan 6 (UTC)

• Delete -- DCEdwards1966 04:42, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Even among fantasy fans, "dragonology" is a far more common term. Starblind 18:17, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- while "dragonology" is not a word (lots of nonexistent words are unfortunately somewhat common, especially in fiction) and "dracology" would be the likely word if it did exist, I don't think either one is notable enough for an article. DreamGuy 21:38, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The word dracology is very rarly used. Dragonology is slightly more used. - Jeltz talk 23:38, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, original classification, trivial construction, nn. Wyss 04:41, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Dragon. -- Netoholic @ 04:45, 2005 Jan 7 (UTC)
• Merge anything useable to Dragon, then add redirect. Megan1967 02:35, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)