Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Complimentary

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 13:19, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

Complimentary[edit]

more Factual knowledge or nonsense for you to ponder --Doc Glasgow 02:34, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Ganymead 02:38, 15 May 2005 (UTC) These guys have certainly been hard at work, I'll take care of causeology while I'm at it.[reply]
Delete. Nonsense; Dear God what a mess. DoubleBlue (Talk) 02:39, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. ESkog 02:41, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Rubbish original research, from an author (Norhuc (talk · contribs)) that doesn't know the difference between compliment and complement. No suitable adjective→noun redirects are immediately apparent. Delete. Uncle G 03:02, 2005 May 15 (UTC)
Delete: Non-verifiable, original research. Contributor is not responding to all of this VfD, so we may have a warrior here or a convert. Geogre 12:43, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all of Norhuc's crap. How do you do that? [1]-MarSch 13:17, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteIanschmutte 18:22, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, original research. Linuxbeak | Desk 20:22, May 15, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.