User talk:Abhishekbh

Abhishek's Talk Page

Not maintaining this page, though will check it regularly, so feel free to post any questions, comments etc...

Yąnomamö

I've reverted some constructive but problematic edits you've made. Please see Talk:Yąnomamö#User:Abhishekbh.27s_edits for details.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 19:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Will you stop by tne Anthropology article discussion page and give your views?

I am claiming that the article on Anthropology (as a general field) doesn't do all that it could. In particular, I think the section on History is mostly about cultural (and should be moved there) and that the lead of the article doesn't do what a person would expect from an article on anthropology. If it were physics, it would talk about the subject matter of the science - not so much about the institutionalization of the science. I think the article is C class (or lower) - what do you think? Please weigh in when you get a chance - it's a longterm discussion.Levalley (talk) 17:34, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Your edits on the Yanomamo

Were fine. I am going to change the article back to your version - it may need a little copyediting (not much), I'm a member of the Copyeditor Guild, that's what we do - any time you need a copyeditor for an anthropology related article, just contact me on my talk page. I'm around pretty often. I do not see the other editor (Fat Man) on the Project Anthropology page, btw, and I think that a more collective approach to these edits is needed.Levalley (talk) 17:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bai Tushum Bank

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bai Tushum Bank, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Compassionate727 (talk) 16:47, 18 May 2015 (UTC)