Talk:Electroactive polymer

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polymers, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PolymersWikipedia:WikiProject PolymersTemplate:WikiProject PolymersPolymers articles

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Robotics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

change text to illustration[edit]

in several places, the words 'cartoon drawing' are used. the word illustration is succinct and accurate. Rqpaine (talk) 16:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Does anybody know where the best information for EAPs regarding their generator capabilities is?

Poymer not the only type[edit]

There should be a link to Pneumatic artificial muscles either from this article or on an Artificial muscle disambiguation page. Of course, mechanical prostheses using cord, levers, etc. have been in use forever. Egmonster 08:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

artificial muscles (EAP elements) totally differ from Pneumatic artificial muscles. Maybe there should be a "not to be confused" link.--Infestor (talk) 20:39, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the generic category "artificial muscles" links to this. There should be a separate article for that since there are a number of things, like Pneumatic artificial muscles that would fall in that category. The ways things are set-up now is totally screwed-up. 75.61.97.29 (talk) 23:34, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Visual[edit]

this article greatly lacks of visuals.--Infestor (talk) 14:22, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong citation[edit]

As the name implies, these gel actuators can also be made with bucky balls instead of nanotubes[8]. but ref. [8] is not on bucky balls (or fullerene) and to my knowledge a bucky gel actuator with fullerene instead of carbon nanotubes was never presented. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.251.200.3 (talk) 12:42, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Electroactive polymers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20121212015419/http://electrochem.cwru.edu/encycl/art-p02-elact-pol.htm to http://electrochem.cwru.edu/encycl/art-p02-elact-pol.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]