User talk:ThePedanticPrick

About me: I am a pedant. If you find your sentences that made perfect sense to your American ears have been edited to actually make grammatical sense, you can probably blame/credit me! I oppose the dumbing-down of our language that is being permitted and promoted by liberal, descriptivist pansies in the American education system. Spelling errors irritate me more than international terrorism, and I take more pleasure from an eloquent and grammatical sentence than I do from the sight of so many naked ladies. I believe that the reason our language has so many words in it is so that we may use them to communicate more precisely and efficiently, not to impress and/or confuse the proletariat (though this is often a desired or undesired side-effect, depending on the situation).

Disclaimer: Just as monkeys occassionally fall from trees, I occasionally make mistakes. I accept this, and though I believe that no one is perfect, I still feel that perfection is a noble goal worth working toward.

Can you help get rid of all those misspellings of honour, neighbour, colour and so forth? Seems some people want these words not to have "u" in them. Seemingly, in some ununilaterial notions of language, one can have honor without obligation, neighbors without consideration, color chosen by bigots not one's own eyes, and so on. This seems very bad.

While you're at it, there are some map errors in here too - all those red states should be part of Mexico and all those blue states should be part of Canada.

Looks like you've ended your disclaimer with a preposition. In the words of Sir Winston: "This is an outrage, up with which I will not put!"

Salutations!

Salve, ThePedanticPrick!
When I was checking the CSV file for my own stats, I came across your entry. Because of our similar handles, I just wanted to say hello. Ave! PedanticallySpeaking 19:26, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)

Funny user name

Made me laugh anyway. Chamaeleon 12:46, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Yes indeed. But how long before the Wikinazis take it away?--Greasysteve13 10:51, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

You fell out of the tree

Hi, Ped. You and the regicides fell out of the tree on Charles II of England, please see my edit summary when I reverted you just now. Actually "homicide" also used to mean a person (=a murderer), but it doesn't any more... and usage rules! Please get back to me if you'd like to know exactly what the OED's got about regicides. Bishonen | Talk 01:57, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Touche, Bishonen. You learn something new every day. But did the regicides fall out of the tree too? The fact that the person usage seemed odd to me may be an argument for its obsolescence. But what do I know? ThePedanticPrick 04:49, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Excuse my prickery

But shouldn't that be proletariat (not "proletariate") on your user page? Love your name, by the way. --Lee Hunter 28 June 2005 15:39 (UTC)

• Thanks, Lee. ThePedanticPrick 28 June 2005 20:24 (UTC)

Inappropriate Wikipedia username

Hi,

Your username has been blocked indefinitely because it is either inappropriate or too similar to an existing username (see our blocking policy for more information). You are encouraged to create a new account and contribute to Wikipedia under a more appropriate username, and in a constructive manner. See Wikipedia:Username for guidance on selecting an appropriate username. You may also edit Wikipedia without creating an account. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia under an inappropriate username. If you would like to discuss the block, you may edit your talk page or email the administrator who blocked you.

Due to Wikipedia's mechanism for enforcing name changes, your IP address may be temporarily blocked. Unless you have also been engaging in vandalism or impersonation of another user, we will remove that block as soon as possible—if this doesn't happen within an hour or so, please email an administrator and explain the situation (see the list of administrators).

If you want to keep the contributions from your old account for your new one, leave a note on Wikipedia:Changing username. This can only be done before you create the new one. If you wish to create a new username, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username for information.

Thanks, Bumm13 08:50, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

• Dear Bumm13, I notice that the page on Blocking Policy contains the following: 'The blocking sysop should include Template:UsernameBlock in the block message...along with a link to the RfC or user talk page where the matter was discussed.' Where is the RfC page where my blocking was discussed? Why is my IP address blocked if you only considered my username offensive and have not accused me of vandalism? How am I supposed to create a new account if my IP address is blocked? ThePedanticPrick 19:26, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
• I really don't think it was appropriate to just ban this account summarily on an ambigous case without any consensus, and so I've unblocked it. Bumm13, I hope you don't feel I'm stepping on your toes here; if there is a consensus that this name is inappropriate of course the block will be reinstated.--Pharos 10:14, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Having come here somewhat at random, let me congratulate you upon your username and your mission, and ask "how can anyone called Bum complain about a Prick?". William M. Connolley 22:53, 13 September 2005 (UTC).

I'm also here accidentally. I concur with William. Also, as many who know me might attest I am a P.P.; it's just unfortunate that you thought of the username first. Ufwuct 22:05, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Quasi-congratulations

Oh PedanticPrick,
On your pseudo-case being removed from WP:ANI. Thus I'll be looking forward to being corrected from you, and re-welcome aboard!
brenneman^(t)(c) 05:36, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

Whites

why did you remove History of the White Race and make a snide comment? That article is relevant to the page. If you don't like it, balance it with something, but please don't just delete it. There is much factual information in that article. PS What is up with that article? Much of that stuff belongs in Whiteness Studies don't you think? Where is there a history of the White/European people on Wikipedia? maybe I need to go there. Thanks. Provost 02:20, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, buddy, but that site is blatantly white supremacist (it proudly portrays Hitler next to other great whites and presumed whites of history, for God's sake!). The only way I can see putting it back in is if there is some sort of disclaimer that says "this is a racist site" or maybe "this site is operated by a white-supremacist group/individual". Oh, and FWIW, I'm white and not the least bit ashamed of it. ThePedanticPrick 14:41, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

It doesn't proudly portray anyboy. It merely notes history. That site has plenty of relevant information in it, and it is only one link, by far not the only one! What do you object to specifically about it? Nonethless, the article about White people we are working on is in need plenty of improvement from "I'm white" people like you, instead of everyone but. Thank you. Provost 02:56, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

Re: Sex abuse article

I really enjoyed the edits you made to the "Criticism of the Criticism" in Sex Abuse. That part was really bugging the hell out of me and I didn't know what to do with it. --Rookiee 19:58, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Angry arab sounds off

It is Niz, Im not anoymous, and are you trying to start an "internet fight" with me by calling me an "ignorant arab". Don't worry man I'm not going to thrash you through the monitor, you're safe. I bet you watch your tongue around people you meet in real life, however. For someone in as high a position as you on wikipedia, you need to grow up, and be less impartial. You are truly ignorant, judgemental, anti-Arab, Islamophobic, and that's just the very beginning. -Niz

Compromise

TPP: can we work on a compromise on White History link? All I really care about is not misdescribing the link, and dismissing the 350 centuries of history that's compiled on that source. Do you know of any other histories of the White/European race(s) compiled into one source that's better?Icemountain 18:56, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

By the way, if you ever wondered who the above editor was, I've documented his activities on Wikipedia. You'll find the summary here: User:Jayjg/Disruptive Apartheid editor. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:04, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

AD vrs CE

Is it really that important, AD is more widely understood and has been used for centuries. Surely this is just atheistic hyper-sensitivity. If you are going to secularise terms that have been quite happily used for generations what about the days of the week?

Sunday ~ Sun god Monday ~ Moon god Tuesday ~ Norse god Tyr Wednesday ~ Woden's day Chief Norse god Thursday ~ Thor's day Norse god of war Friday ~ Frige's Day Norse god of beauty Saturday ~ Saturn's Day

I'm sure you don't defer to any of these gods either? --Quarkstorm 11:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

no offense but...

I think your comments on Cool (African philosophy) are a bit confusing, and when DCV gets confused she gets angry. Usually I wouldn't care about her getting angry, but I made a serious point on the talk page. Could you either a)make your comment on that talk page less confusing or b)remove it? Thanks, --Urthogie 16:08, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Nordish03.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nordish03.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 06:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

DonSiano

CheckUser indicates that it is unlikely that User:DonSiano is the Disruptive Apartheid editor. Jayjg ^(talk) 19:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Eurotrash

I replied. Well someone hadta.--Greasysteve13 10:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Leadership and Management of the Children Of God

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Leadership and Management of the Children Of God, by Joie de Vivre (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Leadership and Management of the Children Of God fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

unencyclopedic, WP is not a directory

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Leadership and Management of the Children Of God, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Programs, projects, and productions of the Children of God

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Programs, projects, and productions of the Children of God, by Joie de Vivre (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Programs, projects, and productions of the Children of God fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

unencyclopedic, WP is not a directory

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Programs, projects, and productions of the Children of God, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Good job on Hefney

I tried to pull that out last week, so prepare to be reverted, but let's try to get rid of that rott. --Kevin Murray 23:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Visitor pattern Motivation paragraph

I saw your complaints about the Visitor pattern article. I agree! The article is lacking a good Motivation paragraph. I've started to write such a Motivation section on the Talk page of the article. Please add your comments and help me improve the Visitor pattern page. --Objarni (talk) 08:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ThePedanticPrick. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ThePedanticPrick. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)