Talk:Putney

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Light Industry[edit]

Should the article include industrial employers? There was a car antenna factory which was a local landmark (during the 70s and 80s commuters on the district line trains traveling at roof height could identify the factory by the car "parked" on its roof). Zagubov (talk) 12:15, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Website addition[edit]

Hello,

I would like to add the following website to this link. Admittedly I am involved with this site so do appreciate the Wiki policy regarding getting other views before this is added.

The website provides additional information about areas above what the Wiki Page can provide (e.g. environemnt, greenspace, schools, etc) It also has additional search functionality.

I would welcome wider views on if this website is appropriate for inclusion.

www.liveanddo.co.uk

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aptw01 (talkcontribs) 10:41, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Putney panorama.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Putney panorama.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Putney panorama.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:06, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why no etymology?[edit]

How to pronounce it: /ˈpʊtni/ or /ˈpʌtni/? JLincoln (talk) 19:39, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Stevekeiretsu (talk) 01:46, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source #35[edit]

check-mark
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

That is a Times Online source. Could someone please eMail me the content of that? I'd like to write an article on Putney High Street.--Launchballer 13:29, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, but not a lot of help: it just says Putney High Street was fifth most "anonymous" (because full of branches of standard chains) out of 27 London high streets in a survey. JohnCD (talk) 15:31, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. I am amazed by the fact that it can't tell the difference between Wimbledon High Street and Wimbledon Broadway.--Launchballer 18:00, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cokayne[edit]

George Cokayne has his own article which does not mention the spelling "Cockayne". The fact that the incorrect spelling is more common does not mean it should supplant the correct one. He should really be linked in this and in the Wimbledon Common article.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 20:20, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely right. He should be linked. Sorry I didn't notice that he had a Wikipedia article. Will fix. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 20:28, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]