Talk:Fortress of Solitude

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled[edit]

Family Guy has done superman parodies twice in the fortress of solitude.

A game released for gameboy advance by electronic arts - 24 November 2006 has been named "Superman Returns: Fortress of Solitude"


What about Doc Savage's Fortress of Solitude?

Whomever did the latest work to this page did an outstanding job!


I was wondering are there any more picture of the Fortress of Solitude?

The first appearace of Superman's Fortress of Solitude is not in 1958[edit]

The Fortress of Solitude first appeared in Superman #58 (May-June 1949 cover date). In the third story of this issue, "The Case of the Second Superman", not only does Superman use the name "Fortress of Solitude" for the first time to describe his fort, but he also indicates that it is located "in the polar waste".Heathcliff 01:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is first mentioned in 1949, but not actually depicted until 1958. I have clarified this. Mandrakos (talk) 15:20, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is wrong. In the third story from Superman 58, "The Case of the Second Superman", the fortress is depicted as Superman flies to it with Regor, "the Second Superman", on the last panel on page 5 (this is the panel where Superman calls it his "Fortress of Solitude") and the first four panels on page 6 show the inside of the Fortress. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heathcliff (talkcontribs) 15:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You are absolutely right, Heathcliff. I have made additional corrections and added an external link with a view of the 1949 Fortress. Mandrakos (talk) 07:44, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, here is it 2022 and someone's made the article wrong again. Why is this so hard to understand?Heathcliff (talk) 19:41, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Smallville Fortress of Solitude Fallout.jpg[edit]

Image:Smallville Fortress of Solitude Fallout.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:18, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DC Special Series 26.JPG[edit]

Image:DC Special Series 26.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Superman187.JPG[edit]

Image:Superman187.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doc Savage's Fortress of Solitude[edit]

um...why is Doc Savage's Fortress of Solitude on this page? It seems like a product of a merger gone wrong. Either give it its own page or put it on Doc Savage's page, but it definitely does not belong on this page. -Jaardon (talk) 00:45, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But of course the fact that the Fortress name and idea is taken from an earlier series is relevant here. At least a bare mention is mandatory -- this is the origin of the page's topic, after all -- and if it were known that some editor who worked on both publications was responsible for carrying the idea over from Savage to Superman, that would also be germane. Mandrakos (talk) 14:56, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

I have been around Wikipedia for a while now, and I must say, I don't understand this nonsense. I have been to the Antartic many times and I've never even heard about this supposed "fortress." Which government owns it? It's not even on google maps! This article looks like vandalism to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.15.63.4 (talk) 18:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is maybe a joke, but I respond. Its a fictional creation from the superman comic universe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricardo Persona (talkcontribs) 00:05, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible inspiration - Caspar David Friedrich - Das Eismeer[edit]

It's maybe just a coincidence, but I find the composition quite ressemblant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricardo Persona (talkcontribs) 00:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The original fortress[edit]

The original concept of the Fortress of Solitude appeared in the 1930 story "Gladiator" by Philip Wylie, which story undoubtedly played a great part in the idea of a Superman.(5.8.186.99 (talk) 19:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fortress of Solitude. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]