Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zazie

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 05:05, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)

Zazie

Delete Vanity Page note that the artist was featured in issue of Computer Graphics, not notable enough of history in the arts(only several shows and Webism exhibits) to warrant an encyclopedia article. Google brings up only 225 hits when typing in Zazie Evi Moechel (her real name). "Zazie" is of course a very popular name in Europe for films, books and TV. This emerging artist is not notable enough to have article, though I highly recommend a user page.Classicjupiter2 17:52, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. Google for Zazie Surrealism gets 1310 hits, -Wikipedia gets 946. -- Infrogmation 18:08, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Only reason that this article was proposed for deletion is Classicjupiter2's personal dislike of subject. Discounting Webism exhibits is POV, for whatever one thinks of Webism is not relevant here. Observation about Zazie being a popular name might be grounds for converting this into a disambiguation page, but is otherwise irrelevant. --Daniel C. Boyer 18:33, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • I am not discounting Webism exhibits, since I mentioned them, plus other shows as well. No personal dislike of article subject, just stating facts on this emerging artist who I highly recommend having a user page like you, Dan.Classicjupiter2 20:02, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No entry in the Grove Art database or any database or journal index I searched. Gamaliel 19:00, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Keep. Just above the bar of notability. Should be moved to Evi Moechel with either a redirect from zazie, or a disambig for zazie if we can find any other zazies in wikipedia. DaveTheRed 19:07, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, but with reservations. Article needs to be renamed Evi Moechel, cleanup and expand. Megan1967 23:34, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:00, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, ad. Wyss 02:17, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep, needs third-party verifiability. Nomination appears querulous - David Gerard 18:06, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Valid article subject, invalid VfD nomination from sockpuppet. Notability is subjective. ~leif ☺ _HELO 22:37, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep but rename. --Valmi ✒ 17:02, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.