Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/911victims

Articles Jonas Martin Panik, Georgine Rose Corrigan and Deborah Jacobs Welsh listed on WP:VFD Apr 16 to May 3 2004, consensus was to transwiki to 911 wiki and delete. Discussion:

9-11 victims not otherwise notable. DJ Clayworth 21:07, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Keep. Not notable for anything aside from 9/11, but 9/11 is enough. Everyking 23:01, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete like the others. - SimonP 23:10, Apr 16, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. 9/11 is NOT enough, unless we're going to rename this project USAPedia. Besides, keeping these articles and others like them implies that an article should be written on anyone else who has ever been a casualty of any non-war event. Jeeves 00:27, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- No it doesn't. It implies that when a society attaches particular importance to the deaths of certain people, articles should be written about them. Everyking 00:40, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  - Society attaches no importance to the deaths of these particular people. Importance was attached to the fact that people died at all. Who they were was almost irrelevant. Memorial and delete. -- Cyrius|&#9998 01:09, Apr 17, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. SWAdair | Talk 04:45, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Move to 9/11 memorial and delete. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:55, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Move to sep11 wiki and delete. Maximus Rex 04:58, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete according to policy. Cribcage 06:39, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Move and delete, as per usual. Average Earthman 11:04, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Whether or not they're notable doesn't matter, but in this case they are. anthony (see warning)
Wikimemorial and delete. Rossami 21:09, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delet and -> Wikimemorial: We have a policy, let's apply it. JimD 00:27, 2004 Apr 24 (UTC)
delete, nonfamous. --Jia ng 05:24, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
delete. non famous. garryq 22:41, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-famous. Fredrik 15:36, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

End discussion

The following vote was added after this discussion was archived:

Keep. BL 16:05, May 3, 2004 (UTC)