Talk:Zorglub

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by European comics work group.

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Comment on content[edit]

Zorglub as a character is more complex than an "arch-vilain": unlike Zantafio, Zorglub is not evil, or even amoral: he is actually astonished and anguished at the consequences of his actions with zorglvertising (people eating soap). He personifies the risks of science without a conscience, as he does things just because they are possible, not cause damage or even get him all the power he could get from it. This is made particularly explicit by his relationship with Zantafio, forcing readers to consider the existence of such a moral position between "good" (Spirou, Fantasio, possibly Champignac), and "evil" (Zantafio/Zantas). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.238.217.133 (talk) 20:14, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on the former and moved Zorglub article[edit]

Without trying to appear to be anti-non-English speaker, but this article really doesn't make any sense. Can someone please turn it into something meaningful? RickK

5 July, 2003

Revert to article[edit]

I boldly moved back the bulk of the text from the previous placement in Characters in Spirou et Fantasio for a couple of reasons. The material is of a size that justifies its own article, it has at least one interwiki, and at the previous location, the text was considered to be simply entries to a list, and therefore not acceptable for image illustration under WP:FAIRUSE. MURGH ^disc. 22:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zorglub. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070301124424/http://www.spirou.com:80/spirou/personnages/zorglub/index.htm to http://www.spirou.com/spirou/personnages/zorglub/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]