Talk:Hair spray

Untitled[edit]

There must be more to say about the history of the product, for example. --Theo (Talk) 16:36, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

One word or two?[edit]

Chambers has it as one word - as in the film etc. Grant 11:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

you can use it as either it does not matter which way it is it works- if you wanna know which it is go to the store and check for yourself —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.157.35.4 (talk) 13:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It's always one word in my experience. The article should be moved, with 'hair spray' as the redirect. --Ef80 (talk) 14:10, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mistakes to be fixed?[edit]

"Pytocalcious is another ingredient in hair spray, which lowers the amount of minerals in the hair's root causing the hair to become stiff.".

shouldn't it be "Pytocalcious chemicals" or "Pytocalcious materials"? and wouldn't lowering the amount of minerals in the hair's roots make it less stiff? minerals are hard substances. i think that highering their amount would make hair stiff. i changed the article according to the above written, please correct if editing was not needed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.0.95.103 (talk) 22:09, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remove unverifiable info[edit]

Let's go ahead and remove ALL the unsourced material from this article... as the comment above makes clear, it has been edited without regard to the original research policy. What the editors think isn't suitable grist for the wikimill. 67.49.8.228 08:38, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the completely unsourced section on the harmful nature of hairspray. Jeff Axelrod (talk) 01:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Really Neccessary??[edit]

"A common movie and video game weapon is hair spray and a lighter to form a makeshift flamethrower, though in reality this is far more dangerous to the user than as a weapon because of the possibility of the flame coming back into the canister and causing an explosion."

? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.81.85 (talk) 17:52, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction?[edit]

The second phrase of the article states that Hair Spray is "Stronger than hair gel, hair wax, or glue" while the Hair Gel article states that hair gel is "stronger than those of hair spray and weaker than those of hair glue hairspray is the shit and i use it all the time! i use tressemmee or hair wax.". I have which of these statements is true, thus I'll leave it to someone else to clarify and edit the article. French Connections (talk) 15:46, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths by hairspray seems somewhat unlikelyRhbjorn (talk) 16:51, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

cost of hair spray[edit]

why is hair spray like 15 or 20 dollars a can? It makes it one of the most expensive grocer store items Mrp8196 (talk) 23:43, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hairspray brands[edit]

There needs to be a page of hairspray brands. those in use today & those that are no longer made. There is surprisingly very little information readily available on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.186.69.50 (talk) 05:19, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]