Talk:York Vision

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal York Vision is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Website out of date[edit]

Anyone know why the york vision website is so out of date? It's not been updated this accademic year by the looks of things... -- Tomhab 11:56, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The last revert to the article on 29th July[edit]

Much of what was removed from the article in that revert does appear to be truew if my memory serves me corrctly, however, I do think the way it was written was not suitable. Also, even some of the bits which were true probably don't need to be incldued. Can someone with a better memory than me varify that the 'Lecturer: my child porn shame' stuff and the media awards stuff is all true? I know the paper won the Guardian aweard thing for at least 3 years in a row and there was at least one lecturer arrested over child pornography which I read about in the paper. Evil Eye 17:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Turns out you were right about the media awards stuff! Maragil (talk) 15:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:York Vision/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Requires photographs
Requires copy-edit for WP:MOS
Lists need attention - turn into prose if appropriate

Keith D 15:49, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 20:53, 12 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 11:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Undoing of revisions[edit]

As per WP:COI I note that I have undone the revisions throughout March referring to 'controversy'. Whilst factually accurate, it was very poorly written. Further, I note I am the author of the article which was referred to, and the person who did the research that the article was based off. I also believe the author themselves had a COI, as they identified themselves to me, but naturally will not identify them.

Maragil (talk) 15:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]