User talk:Dickdexter

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Graham ☺ | Talk 18:13, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Redirects[edit]

Welcome to wikipedia! Just to tell you about redirects... this -- #REDIRECT [[Institute on the Constitution]] -- is the proper format. Also, while redirects are great, it's as good to do them to articles that don't exist yet. Write the main article, and then redirect all you like (that is, all logical choices people might make when looking for the main article). If you have questions, just ask me on my talk page. --Zantastik 03:39, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Pat Corcoran[edit]

You included in this article the claim: "Corcoran began his campaign speaking of the need to defeat the extreme conservatism of Republican incumbent and former Constitution Party member Delegate Don Dwyer." Someone claiming to be Corcoran's son or daughter is challenging that; can you back it up? Unless you can, the sentence will ahve to be removed from the article. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 14:40, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Politician stubs you have been creating[edit]

I've noticed that you have been creating many politician stubs, namely from Anne Arundel County. The facts seem to be accurate, but the stubs are not very encyclopedic in that most every sentence is put into a new paragraph and they all begin with the person's last name (For example: Kyle did this. Kyle did that. Kyle is currently doing this.).

Consider using some transitional phrases to make the articles flow better. Thanks. --tomf688^(talk) 17:12, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Dickdexter! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,240 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Michael Littleton - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:55, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dirk Haire[edit]

The article Dirk Haire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — ξ ^xplicit 00:23, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Janet S. Owens for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janet S. Owens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet S. Owens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 21:44, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]