Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ressonace Cascade

Ressonace Cascade was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete.

I can't believe we need a separate article on a fictional concept of such minor interest, particularly since the author can't be bothered to spell it properly. Deb 18:32, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Delete. Gamaliel 19:16, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete: The Half Life article already mentions this fictional disaster, and it spells it properly. Geogre 20:44, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete: covered under Half Life and Half Life 2 Fifelfoo 22:27, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Redirect to Half-Life. Plus a version of it spelled correctly. I think this preempt any future confusion about whether this is a real term or not. --Fastfission 23:53, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete and merge anything useful into Half Life. Don't redirect because 1) its spelt wrong 2) I can't imagine anyone, ever entering the term into Wikipedia. David Johnson 17:32, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete without merge. Otherwise concur with David Johnson. --Improv 21:27, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
The G-Man told me to say delete. [[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 04:02, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.