Talk:Royalty and the Peerage

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Commonwealth, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Commonwealth of Nations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CommonwealthWikipedia:WikiProject CommonwealthTemplate:WikiProject CommonwealthCommonwealth articles

British Royalty

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles

This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page:
• British royal family
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:British royal family
Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions.

No sense[edit]

Should there be no Duke of Cornwall at any time, the Duchy includes over 570 square kilometres of land, most of which lies in Devon.

This makes no sense: the physical area of the Duchy is not related to the existence of a Duke. Does anyone know what it was intended to say, or should I just remove the first clause? Marnanel 21:52, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Someone probably meant to say that the Duchy's income goes to the Crown if there's no Duke of Cornwall. - Nunh-huh 22:01, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)