Talk:Thomas Simpson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Shouldn't the history of Simpson's Rule be on that article, not here? --199.95.32.10 11:39, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the evidence for Keppler being the original discoverer of Simpson's rule? - Taxman 05:35, May 22, 2005 (UTC)

Agreed. A few quick google searches doesn't show any connection between Kepler and the rule. However, I did stumble across something indicating that the formula originated with the egyptians: link - --Orang55 06:00, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That probably depends on the search terms. In textbooks on numerical mathematics written in German this method is often also referred to as Keplersche Fassregel. The original reference appears to be the work Nova Stereometria doliorum vinariorum published by Kepler in Linz in 1615. According to the German wikipedia entry http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keplersche_Fassregel Kepler got interested in computing the contents of wine barrels, because he was not satisfied by the procedure the merchant employed from which he had bought the casks for his second wedding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.84.9.25 (talk) 12:19, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Biography[edit]

Just wondering how Simpson managed to be appointed Regius professor of St Andrew's at the ripe old age of 25 whilst he was still touting his mathematical wares around the coffee bars of London? This spatial difficulty is then trumped by his temporal feat of continuing in this post until 1768 after his death in 1761. Shome mishtake shurely? Chrysippo (talk) 11:58, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thomas Simpson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thomas Simpson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:55, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]