Talk:Woodlawn, Chicago

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Nice job with Woodlawn. I've written articles on urban themes as well, including the articles on Hyde Park, Pullman, and Pilsen. User:Dinopup

For improvements to the article, why not mention 63rd St. in the old days?

For a fun factoid on Woodlawn, Hugh Hefner put together the first Playboy while living near the power plant on Blackstone. Amelia Earhart was a grad of Hyde Park HS in Woodlawn.

Current Institutions[edit]

Inner City Chicago[edit]

I'm not sure why this is a sub-title, and for the record, it existed before I made the first post in it. Does whoever created the "Inner City Chicago" sub-title know where Woodlawn is located? If they think that Woodlawn, Chicago is in inner city Chicago, then Inner city needs to be redefined. 173.75.117.35 (talk) 05:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Depopulation, open space[edit]

Beginings of Gentrification[edit]

the green line[edit]

the powers that be[edit]

state of organizing and development[edit]

Where it could go[edit]

Hello,

I've lived in Woodlawn a long, long time and I wonder about the article's references to "improvement" in Woodlawn. *In the part of the neighborhood adjoining the University of Chicago,* it is true that crime has dropped, and that students are no longer officialy discouraged from living here. But that's mostly because of the University Police patrolling that area, and because wealthier, often white professional families are moving in. Gentrification here is not a unilateral "improvement." The shrinking of the rental housing market and the rise in property taxes have been displacing a lot of longtime, lower-income African American residents. Affordable housing is now in even shorter supply.

Marykderr 00:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)M.[reply]

Yes, because a lower crime rate and an influx of intelligent, hardworking, tax PAYING citizens is never an improvement to an area. Nope. Can't have that. Maybe if the idiot, slack, tax RECEIVING citizens would learn to stop crapping all over everything they've ever gotten (been given?) things wouldn't be that way now would they? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.69.81.2 (talk) 19:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Woodlawn, Chicago. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Woodlawn,_Chicago&oldid=1201910565"