Talk:East Perth Football Club

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Today I formatted the list of best-and-fairest winners but given its length it would probably be best to split it off to its own page, linked from here. --The Brain of Morbius 03:12, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Missing best-and-fairests[edit]

Incidentally, why wasn't there a winner of the B&F awarded in 1975?--The Brain of Morbius 03:14, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]


There was a 1975 winner, I'm not sure where this information (on this page) was sourced from but I've now added it in, as well as the 1930 winner which for many years had been 'forgotten' but the club recently worked out who it was. 202.154.74.114 06:45, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fairest and Best move to new article?[edit]

I'm wondering if we should move the FD Book medal list to a separate article, to reduce the size of the page. Most AFL clubs have it like this, and I don't see why a WAFL club should be any different. Nic the Man 13:13, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Eperth.png[edit]

Image:Eperth.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:19, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]