User talk:Congyu

Division I-A to I-BS[edit]

I know the name sounds like spam, but BS = Bowl Subdivision. Cong Yu 15:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the false correction...indeed it looked like the usual vandalism to me. Thanks for the update. 66.65.76.15 16:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

peyton edit[edit]

just wondering why the edit removing whom he is married to. i saw on the discussion page for fmccown you said ashley simpson, but the sentence he added was correct. manning is married to ashley thompson and has been since 2001. i had mentioned it on the talk page, and hoped it would be added in order to quell some of the constant "gay rumors" and gay edits added to his page. (likely by Pats fans, lol) Kmccusker2 06:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I thought it was vandalism. Cong Yu 16:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, do we have a good source for his marriage? Cong Yu 16:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, theres the occasional shots of her on TV, or http://espn.go.com/talent/danpatrick/s/2001/0822/1242493.html

an interview with outtakes from him http://www.nfl.com/features/2002/thanksgiving/mannings.html a recent article so yes, there are credible sources for his marriage.Kmccusker2 06:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

List of social networking websites[edit]

Hi. I have reverted your insertion of a sortable table due to long-standing concerns discussed in the talk page for the article. Please take a look at the discussions to assess consensus regarding false numbering e.g. 11,000 comes above 10,000,000, which is wrong. If you can format a sortable table which overcomes this major problem, don't hesitate to add it to the List format. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 10:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't seem to see the incorrect sorting problem you mentioned here? When you sort, the first click sorts entries from small to large; and the second click sorts entries from large to small (the desired order). I think the benefits of viewing entries in sorted order is significant. Cong Yu 19:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it sorts 9s to the top and 1s to the bottom, regardless of how many noughts follow the numeral. Clicking the sort arrows at the top merely turns the problem upside down i.e. sorts the 1s to the top and the 9s to the bottom, regardless of noughts. Have a look at the comments on the talk page, you will see that contributors, including me, all have the same problem. Ref ^(chew)(do) 21:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Further to the above, either my computer has changed, or the Wiki source coding has changed, but anyway the sortable table currently being employed at List of social networking websites is working as I had always hoped it would. Thanks and sorry for the fuss. Ref ^(chew)(do)

Image copyright problem with File:Jag-web.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Jag-web.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cite Unseen update[edit]

Hello! Thank you for using Cite Unseen. The script recently received a significant update, detailed below.

You can now toggle which icons you do or don't want to see. See the configuration section for details. All icons are enabled by default except for the new generally reliable icon (described below).
New categorizations/icons:
- Advocacy: Organizations that are engaged in advocacy (anything from political to civil rights to lobbying). Note that an advocacy group can be reliable; this indicator simply serves to note when a source's primary purpose is to advocate for certain positions or policies, which is important to keep in mind when consuming a source.
- Editable: Sites that are editable by the public, such as wikis (Wikipedia, Fandom) or some databases (IMDb, Discogs).
- Predatory journals: These sites charge publication fees to authors without checking articles for quality and legitimacy.
- Perennial source categories: Cite Unseen will mark sources as generally reliable, marginally reliable, generally unreliable, deprecated, and blacklisted. This is based on Wikipedia's perennial sources list, which reflects community consensus on frequently discussed sources. Sources that have multiple categorizations are marked as varied reliability. Note that generally reliable icons are disabled by default to reduce clutter, but you can enable them through your custom config. A special thanks to Newslinger, whose new Sourceror API provides the perennial sources list in a clean, structured format.
With the addition of the new categorizations, the biased source icon has been removed. This category was very broad, and repetitive to the new advocacy and perennial sources categorizations that are more informative.

If you have any feedback, requested features, or domains to add/remove, don't hesitate to bring it up on the script's talk page. Thank you! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 23:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message as a user of Cite Unseen. If you no longer wish to receive very occasional updates, you may remove yourself from the mailing list.