Talk:Treasurer

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Occupations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations articles

Finance & Investment High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Corrections[edit]

Changed the page from a redirect to Treasury, as I felt that in modern society a Treasurer doesn't have to be part of a government treasury, which is what the Treasury page is about. JiMternet 20:42, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I thought Wikipedia policy was to retain the spellings of the original author rather than go through and Americanise them all? JiMternet 21:03, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I have corrected a few minor grammatical and typographical errors and restored the anglicised spellings which were already present in the beginning of the article. --Shastrix 6 July 2005 13:47 (UTC)

Despite this, someone has reverted back to the american spellings. JiMternet 20:18, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Neither "tresorial" nor "treasurial" is in the Oxford English Dictionary, which renders their credibility questionable: are they even real words? Bibizou (talk) 13:48, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures[edit]

Is the picture of a gravestone really relevant here? Or maybe this guy was the superman of treasurers? Balt79 (talk) 08:11, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the sentiment, and I removed the image. Arthena ^(talk) 09:56, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]