Talk:Expendable launch system

Rocketry High‑importance

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spaceflight Top‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Talk[edit]

Ariane was not ICBM derived and neither were the Saturns. - Roadrunner

Good point. Though it can be argued that at least the Saturn I/IB were heavily ICBM derived (using redstone and jupiter tankage as they did), though they were designed as launch vehicles.

I think some point about the general lack of new designs explicitly for launch vehicles should be mentioned.

Actually, Atlas V and Delta IV aren't terribly icbm derived anymore, either...
Audin 19:42, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)

A prime example of this is the Titan IV, probably the costliest launch vehicle in history (perhaps following the Space Shuttle). Wasn't Saturn V more expensive? Unless you are talking about cost/mass to LEO, in which case the most expensive launch vehicle would probably be one of the much smaller rockets?--Todd Kloos 04:46, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Missle or Launch vehicle[edit]

The V-2 was a ballistic missile with the payload warhead staying attached so hardly a launch vehicle.

Regarding the Cold War weapons issue the Vanguard rocket was derived from Sounding Rockets rather than operational weapons. The Saturn family began life as the National Booster programme with the aim of creating a civilian space launcher.Piersmasterson 13:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Impossible?[edit]

The article currently makes the odd claim that In principle an expendable single stage to orbit vehicle would be impossible. Uhh... why? Jpatokal 11:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well with current materials it is. With a huge takeoff rocket, you are then trying to carry the mass of the huge rocket to orbit. It just doesnt work. A multi-stage rocket works because it jetisons the mass of the empty tanks.Eregli bob (talk) 13:36, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History section[edit]

It's a very good history section, and contains lots of interesting and relevant information - if this were an article about the Space Shuttle. For an article about ELVs, the relevance is rather less clear... Rmsgrey (talk) 16:10, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Expendable launch system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141008022811/http://www.arianespace.com/about-us-corporate-information/shareholders.asp to http://www.arianespace.com/about-us-corporate-information/shareholders.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:11, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Expandable launch vehicle" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Expandable launch vehicle. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Anarchyte (talk | work) 12:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Absturz Chinese astroaircraft.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:51, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]