Talk:ArtCyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Reference works (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles

We've already had a discussion about having links to all websites that come down the pike...Wikipedia isn't a web directory. --Larry Sanger

Worth of this article?[edit]

What exactly is the worth of this article? The ArtCyclopeida is a valuable resource, but I don't think it requires a separate encyclopedia article. Referencing it in relevant art articles should be enough. Tullie 20:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why I removed PROD[edit]

I don't see any reason to single this article out for deletion while retaining articles about similar web resources, as listed in Category:Virtual art museums and galleries. At a bare minimum, the proposed deletion should be discussed at AfD. Artcyclopedia seems to be widely respected, as indicated by the following collection of online reviews, articles, and awards:

--orlady 16:30, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]