Talk:Blockhead

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

A search on "Preston Lions" and "blockheads" comes up with only two hits; one is invalid because the terms appear in two different blog entries that only happen to share a page, and the second does not make clear whether "blockheads" is any sort of identifying designation for these fans or simply an insult. Even if it is in use, it's evidently not wide use. -- Antaeus Feldspar 11:53, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, removed. Feel free to reinstate if some sort of evidence can be given, but entries like this get "silly" vandalism added all the time, so it's hard to keep without better evidence. --Interiot 22:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Simply to put this on record, the second and third results of a Google search for the term "Blockhead" currently link to the Blockhead cartoon character from Newgrounds.com. If nothing else, let that lend the character viability in being represented here, the popularity of the series notwithstanding. Please help to curb vandalism to the blockhead disambiguation by undoing the attempts of vandals to remove it as an entry. Thank you!


Blockhead, I would say, could be considered notable and deserve it's own article, however I am unsure and would prefer to get some form of support for it rather than be banned for creating a article on a unnotable subject. --Fulizer (talk) 11:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That was attempted by a fan once before and the page was removed - for now, the disambiguation seems like enough. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.206.85.119 (talk) 23:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why the pejorative "Idiot"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:FBD0:5640:4530:2CBA:C004:466C (talk) 12:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]