Talk:Motorola 88000

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Motorola 88000 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronics Mid‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

why give up?[edit]

In the late 1980s several companies were actively watching the 88000 for future use, including NeXT and Apple Computer, but both gave up by the time the 88110 was available in 1990"'

So why did they give up?

What was its "fatal flaw?"[edit]

I have heard multiple times (such as in this article about DWARF) that a major reason why the 88000 architecture got discontinued would have been that it had one or more "fatal flaws" in its design: flaws that would have made the projects' long-term technical goals impossible.

But what were they? I have a vague recollection that I once heard that it would have had something to do with cache and multiprocessing — something which the architecture was considered novel at at the time.

If someone has more insight into what issue it was, and has a credible source, please write a section in the article about it! I think that it could be quite interesting. Johan Hanson (talk) 22:15, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Darn good question[edit]

I used the 88k for a "high-powered" embedded system in the late 80s and I thought it was a really nice CPU, easy to design with, program for and easy to get good performance with minimal tweaking. At the time it had some very advanced concepts which made efficient pipelining a snap.

However, the multi-chip design of the 88100 (needed two MMUs and one CPU; remember, split I/D buses!) was a big turn-off in general, initial performance was disappointing, the separate MMU chips slowed things down even more, and it wasn't cheap. The 88110 was a major improvement in both speed and ease of use, but they were always behind in the CPU clock speed wars... and wasn't long after that PowerPC was announced. Combined with Sun's heroic efforts to spread the gospel of SPARC, the chip was doomed. A shame, but I think the answer is that just came out at exactly the wrong time. If the 88110 had been released in the late 80s, it probably would've caught on.

I believe Ford (yeah, the car people) also used it in a graphics workstation, but I may be misremembering. The 88k actually had special instructions for doing Gouraud shading calculations.

i have m88k in NCD MCX Xterminal, works nice, uses plain simm (72pin) as memory and so on, bootable via tftp, just stating that more than Apple were using this cpu.

CD entertainment system[edit]

Didn't Philips Corporation produce an entertainment system that was 88000-based? 198.177.27.15 (talk) 03:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe so. 07:45, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Motorola 88000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060505211333/http://alge.anart.no/projects/dolphin/comp.newprod-1991 to http://alge.anart.no/projects/dolphin/comp.newprod-1991

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"88100" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 88100. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"88200" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 88200. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]