Talk:Vertical loop

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Are y'sure L'Hospital's quinticde l'hospital/quintique de l'hospital.shtml doesn't get used? (Wish I knew its English name.) 142.177.24.163 03:49, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)

corrected linkTamfang (talk) 01:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

corkscrew vs revolution[edit]

the corkscrew at knott's berry farm also claims to be the first modern steel looping coaster, also opened in 1975. Anyone who knows which is true could maybe put a note in explaining the discrepancy? wimbledon andy 14:28, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

High G-forces really the cause for injuries?[edit]

Were the high G-forces (>6 G) of a circular loop really the main source for injuries? I would suspect another mechanism: If the a more or less straight track is followed by a circular loop there not only a sudden onset of maximum G-forces but also an extreme angular acceleration: The car (and the passenger sitting inside) is forced to a fast rotation at once. Due to inertia the passenger's head is pulled foward when the loop starts and forced backwards at the exit. Especially the forward pull may cause neck injuries similar to those after a (moderate) car crash. The "Thriller" coaster is an example that near-circular loops are possible if the entrances and the exits are made clothoide-shaped. The G-forces of 6.5 G were slightly higher than at the "Nessie"-Loop (Hansa-Park Sierksdorf, Germany, 5.6 G) or the Olympia Looping (5.2 G).--SiriusB 14:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

almaa

Flight manoeuvre[edit]

Every single interwiki-linked article is about a flight manoeuvre, and this article is about rollercoasters. Is it a joke? This article should be unlinked from the others. Wizardist (talk) 16:16, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the interwiki links need to be updated, in that case. That use would be included at Aerobatic maneuver—there isn't nearly enough burden to make "Vertical loop" redirect to the aerobatics page. czar · · 04:35, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vertical loop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looping vertical[edit]

Eu quero saber o que é looping vertical 200.123.237.47 (talk) 17:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]