Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Light Formerly Known as Blinking

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was deleted already. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 02:48, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The Light Formerly Known as Blinking[edit]

Traffic lights are not notable! — Phil Welch 06:19, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If the information can be verified, it could be merged with Taos, New Mexico. Angela . 06:22, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
Delete Notability. Even if true it is little more than a weak testimonial to a trivial fact.Tobycat 06:46, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. —tregoweth 06:52, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Phil's reason was well-put. --Idont Havaname 07:10, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All public institutions are notable. What not traffic lights? Delete then. Sjakkalle 08:35, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The title made me laugh, but that's no reason for a keep. Linuxbeak | Desk 12:19, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. If there was evidence that it was officially designated as a historic landmark by the local government, or some other similar reason, maybe... Zzyzx11 (Talk) 14:40, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unencyclopedic. My hometown has one of those, too. Should we start a disambig page? Joyous 20:36, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

Keep Traffic lights are a public institution and are inherently notable. Kidding, of course, Denni ☯ 01:33, 2005 May 29 (UTC)
Delete, not notable. Megan1967 04:11, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
BJAODN. R adiant _* 10:43, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
Delete notability. JamesBurns 11:27, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.