Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google Jockey

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.

Despite the subsequent improvement of the article, this is still a neologism with no evidence found of widespread use. Rossami (talk) 05:52, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Google Jockey[edit]

Recently coined, non-notable neologism. 31 Google hits. Delete. --OpenToppedBus 11:48, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Fairly interesting idea, but that doesn't make it notable. --the wub (talk) 15:04, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable Stancel 00:30, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's interesting, but I doubt it's that widely used at this point.EvilPhoenix 03:24, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, neologism. Megan1967 05:29, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I edited the page today to expand the historical and contemporary context for "Google Jockey" as a useful term. Also added two external links to substantiate the presence of Google Jockeying. JustinHall 19:48, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I have heard of this phenomena before but I have never heard the term. However if another term arises, the page can always be renamed later. Alex Krupp 04:25, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.