Talk:List of knowledge management concepts

Business High‑importance

	Business portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Libraries Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I started this page to give a feel for the central areas that KM covers. Please help Dgrey 16:54, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I think its a good idea - but should be left open for multiple concepts to be placed before any decision is made on what is Core --Snowded 01:14, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not. I think it simply a specialized dictionary, appropriate for transwikifying. To the extent there's content, it's duplicative. I intend to propose deletion. DGG (talk) 20:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to support that, no one has been particularly involved and there are simply too many knowledge management articles - and none of them are very good--Snowded TALK 20:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]