Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godawful Fan Fiction
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 18:41, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)
Godawful Fan Fiction[edit]
God--, well, demiurgeawful prolixity about a website. Wikipedia is not a web directory. Hoary 07:34, 2005 Feb 20 (UTC)
Delete Edited this argument because am an idiot. 3) This is my first wiki article. It will be cleaned up. Pyresun 07:52, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Send for Cleanup. otherwise Delete. The sub-forum descriptions need to go. - Mailer Diablo 08:06, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- On it. - Pyresun 08:12, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Actually we certainly can have one website and refuse others. We can have, say, ebay, because it is an international phenomena that has altered the economy of used merchandise, while, say, rejecting an article on ploog.com, because, quite frankly, it really isn't anything, as far as I can tell. As for this article, I'm going to vote delete unless further notability is established. -R. fiend 08:15, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Right now I'm rewriting the article to be based around terminology and just general info on fanfiction terms used across the internet, would that be okay?
- If it's going to be an article on fanfiction terminology then it would certainly need a different title. Depending on exactly what you're doing I might suggest trying to work it in as a section in the current fanfiction article. -R. fiend
- Good point. Changed my thing to delete, and vow to do better next time. ...at 08:38, 2005 Feb 20 Pyresun forgot to hit the twiddle key
- I wish all users are having their articles deleted could handle it with such maturity (eg Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Wily Python). Well done. -R. fiend 08:50, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Good point. Changed my thing to delete, and vow to do better next time. ...at 08:38, 2005 Feb 20 Pyresun forgot to hit the twiddle key
- If it's going to be an article on fanfiction terminology then it would certainly need a different title. Depending on exactly what you're doing I might suggest trying to work it in as a section in the current fanfiction article. -R. fiend
- Right now I'm rewriting the article to be based around terminology and just general info on fanfiction terms used across the internet, would that be okay?
- Cleanup and change terribly POV title. If this is a reference to a website called "Godawful Fan Fiction" (I really can't tell it's such a mess) then the word (website) needs to be added to the title to preserve NPOV. 23skidoo 16:13, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. -Sean Curtin 17:33, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't see the notability here. --Woohookitty 18:19, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, This article is somewhat of a mess, POV and it fails to obtain notability. Inter 18:22, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a web directory. — Gwalla | Talk 02:38, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.