User talk:Pluke

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Teach First, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Gurubrahma 06:15, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

On 1 November, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Warrior (arcade game), which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Allen3 ^talk 22:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Editing other users' pages

Please do not edit other users' pages. It is very bad Wiktionary etiquette. Thanks. — Paul G 08:23, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Partly my mistake - I should have said "Wikipedia". See the history of my user page. I was a long time ago, but I've only just noticed it. — Paul G 09:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Apology accepted, thanks. Not to worry, I made my fair share of faux pas when I was a newbie too :) — Paul G 11:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Image(s) of the great wall

Hi Pluke,
Thanks fo uploading your picture(s) of the great wall!
I'm admin D-Kuru form Wikimedia Commons. While cleaning up Commons:Category:Great Wall of China I found your image without a local information (Badaling, Mutianyu, ???).

Picture(s):

• Image:Inside of tower on Great Wall.jpg

Can you please tell me on my commons discussion page where is it from.
Thank you D-Kuru 14:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

http://gawker.com/5554154/what-does-a-video-look-like-after-1000-youtube-uploads

E-ink_ghost.jpg

Sorry for taking this long to reply. Yes, do as you wish with the E-ink ghost image. I don't know much about moving images to wikicommons, so please feel free to do so (as long as you comply with the cc-by license, of course). -- Iván Sánchez^(talk) 09:39, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the cup of tea!

I'll taste it... although I prefer coffee to tea:) Circuit-fantasist, Circuit dreamer (talk, contribs, email) 15:10, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Pluke; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Blender contribution

"Special effects for episode 6 of Red Dwarf season X, were created using blender.[47] The episode screened in 2012." I have visited the cited reference and found no direct mention the company used Blender on the associated production, not to say they did not, I am positive they did but can find no proof yet. Can you provide this information? If unable, the edit may need be removed as it is unable to be confirmed without statement from the publisher/production and at which point would become an opinion, not fact. Unfortunately, this is subject to WP:YESPOV and classified as opinion until a fact is presented. I will reword it as a suspision until a firm reference is cited.Kevintampa5 (talk) 02:27, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Blender Contribution 2

That appears to be more appropriate, as well as the link I will post below, which leads to Ben Simonds blog page where he mentions this himself. If you would like to add to what is there, that is good. Otherwise I will do so when I get a little more free time.

"Hi Kevin,

This might be a more appropriate link: http://www.blendernation.com/2012/10/11/blender-used-for-red-dwarf/ Let me know on my talk page if possible."

http://bensimonds.com/tag/blender/ is Ben's portfolio blog. On a small side note, might I suggest making your edits in a chronological fashion. The newest entries usually are applied toward the bottom of the section it is being added. Yours was placed originally in between tags for 2010 and Blender's origin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevintampa5 (talk • contribs) 00:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:CPT-Structured_Chart_Example.svg

What software did you use to create this image:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CPT-Structured_Chart_Example.svg

Do you know how to make them in MS Visio? SharkD  Talk  07:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

I used inkscape. VIsio would probably be easier--Pluke (talk) 23:21, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pluke. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pluke. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pluke. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pluke. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Unparliamentary language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SNP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:55, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virginia Water, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Bourne.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Meshroom

Hello Pluke,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Meshroom for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Govvy (talk) 13:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Meshroom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meshroom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meshroom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Govvy (talk) 14:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Meshroom moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Meshroom, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 02:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Meshroom moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Meshroom, has been draftified as part of a deletion discussion. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 05:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Meshroom

Hello, Pluke. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Meshroom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Meshroom

Hello, Pluke. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Meshroom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:41, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: AliceVision (January 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Tagishsimon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Tagishsimon (talk) 02:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Pluke! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tagishsimon (talk) 02:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

RS

Re this. You need to look up original research on Wikipedia. Emails to Wikipedia editors are not reliable sources. There are several other problems with your revert, including the reinstatement of self-published sources for claims of a living person, in contravention of WP:BLPRS, and citing a source that has nothing to do with what it purportedly 'cites'. Urve (talk) 18:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Urve some of the references can be culled, maybe, but is anyone seriously questioning whether Chomsky appeared in episode 10?. The removal of this section seems a bit overkill. Could we focus on trimming the refs? Pluke (talk) 18:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

I have no particular reason to doubt Chomsky was there. Presumably one can just cite the actual episode instead of citing random Facebook posts and emails to Wikipedia editors and sources that don't even mention the subject. I have zero familiarity with the show so I won't be doing that; I edited the article for the sole purpose of removing its terrible sourcing, but my efforts were reverted. Urve (talk) 18:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Urve I've tried to tidy things up a bit. You're right, the sourcing was rather innappropriate, maybe flagging with Failed_verification or similar would be easier than dropping a whole section? Pluke (talk) 20:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC)