Talk:Southampton Itchen (UK Parliament constituency)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Southampton Itchen (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Southampton Itchen (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1983 - "Conservative gain SDP" or "Conservative gain from Labour"?[edit]

I am not sure that it is correct to describe the 1983 result as "Conservative gain from SDP". While Bob Mitchell, the defeated sitting MP was a member of the SDP, he been a Labour member prior to 1981 and had always been elected under the Labour banner including at the last general election. The SDP did not exist until 1981 and thus had never contested the seat. Looking at other cases in 1983 where a Labour member had defected to the SDP the results are described differently. For example Leyton which was won by Labour is described as a Labour hold though the defeated incumbent MP Bryan Magee was standing for the SDP which he had defected to in 1982. In Hayes and Harlington, Neville Sandelson had previously been elected as Labour, but was SDP from 1981 and contested the seat as SDP in 1983. The Conservatives gained it, and it is described as "Conservative gain from Labour". To my mind these two examples are more correct as gain/hold status is usually based on the last general election. I would therefore propose to amend this, but would be interested in other editors' views. Dunarc (talk) 19:44, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]