Talk:1960

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Apple community#Other sites|Cult of Mac]] The anchor (#Other sites) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

ToC[edit]

uh, Why is the table of contents at the BOTTOM of the page?

Format[edit]

26-June-2007: The years 1900-1999 have a condensed Table of Contents since 28May07. See Talk:1950#Format (and "Talk:1950#Condensed TOC"). -Wikid77 22:05 26-June-2007

2004 page layout years[edit]

There is a discussion on my talk page on page layout.

For most of the last three hundred years there is inconsistency and duplication between the year in topic paragraph, the "see also" box and what is on the year by topic pages. Prior to 1950 I am pretty convinced we can painlessly (except for sore fingers) delete all of the year in topic paragraphs and ensure that the material goes into a "see also" box, creating such a box where none exists. Post 1950, particularly from the "year in US television" link a lot of material has been added to this paragraph as highlights (sometimes making up most of the page content pointed at).

Personally I think we should still delete the paragraph, keep the box linking to the topic sites and move any particularly important parts of the year in topic paragraph to the main chronological list. This does involve undoing quite a bit of work which someone has done.

Therefore, unlike for prior to 1950 (where I've said no objection= I do it) for post 1950 I won't touch these pages unless a significant number of people agree with the change. (I am also unlikely to get the pre 1950 stuff done before summer unless the service speed improves dramatically). (talk)--BozMo 14:19, 7 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

OECD[edit]

There are two dates given.. which is right? 69.70.147.129 12:54, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Soundgarden?[edit]

"September 4 - Kim Thayil, Guitarist of the now defunct grunge band Soundgarden is born"

This is offensive and probably vandalism. The birth of some random member of a semi-famous rock band is not noteworthy enough for this page. I am removing it.

Such a person would qualify to be included in the Births section of the article, but certainly not the Events section. Lkjhgfdsa 0 (talk) 17:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ships[edit]

I don't see the immediate relevance of "Ship events" at the bottom of the page. I feel this should be in a seperate article. Any thoughts? Jellevc (talk) 10:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what is meant here by "immediate relevance". However, I agree that it's not really an important enough issue to warrant a section of its own here. If you can think of another article where it would be more appropriate to add this information then fine. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Clayton[edit]

Adam Clayton id not Irish. He was born in England. Someone should fix that. Miss Bono^[zootalk] 20:08, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Tony Goldwyn May 2014.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 23:39, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Wanda Vázquez, governor de porto rico.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:52, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Prince Andrew August 2014 (cropped).jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:37, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

CheHigh.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Reza Pahlavi by Gage Skidmore.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:25, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]