Wikipedia:Peer review/Internet Explorer/archive1

Internet Explorer

After much rewritting and reorganization, the article is much less biased than before. But before submissing for featured article, I'd like to have more people to take a brief look of the article and give comments, if any. --minghong 09:50, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

• Wow! That's amazing work Minghong. I came back to the article and I agree - this is SO much better than it was before! The history section is pretty amazing. However... it still needs references. Even though I know that many of the sections are summarised from bigger pages (good work on those, btw) at least the main sources from those articles should be noted in the references section. Speaking of the subpages, may I suggest that a modicum or work be done on the lead sections? Remember that each article should be able to stand as an article in it's own right, and this means that the title should be in bold and the lead section should be at the very least one paragraph of more than three sentences, preferably two paragraphs and no more than three paragraphs. Otherwise: well done! - Ta bu shi da yu 13:40, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Maybe we can take the references back from the main articles. That's a simple task. And for the main articles, they can be fixed later. ;-) --minghong 17:41, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
  • I added some references and footnotes. But maybe that's not enough. --minghong 18:56, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
• FYI, I nominate the article as feature article candidate again. Please vote for it! ;-) --minghong 06:21, 28 May 2005 (UTC)