Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wwcarpen
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 03:44, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
Wwcarpen and Aghost[edit]
More examples of the "I can't be bothered..." kind of articles. Two articles weighing in at a total of 3 (three) sentences. "See also" indicates that they are related, text doesn't explain how. Neither article makes an attempt to establish notability. FWIW, there used to be a musician from Baltimore who went under the name WWCarpen; according to the article, "In 2005, wwcarpen died as a logical extension of his initial starting conditions.". Whatever that means. Rl 19:07, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm guessing it was a way of referring to the fact that all which is born is born temporarily. Jeez, I didn't phrase that in a way much less unusual than Rl's way. Barno 19:30, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. EvilPhoenix 00:49, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Wwcarpen per my musical group article policy and delete Aghost as vanity. Kelly Martin 03:07, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete both. Not notable, vanity. Megan1967 06:53, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd like to propose that since wikipedia is defined by reality, wikipedia can also define reality, thus giving an artist a chance to shape their own destiny. perhaps my argument is standard fare here, but i feel that no harm is done by wikipedia growing beyond where people feel it should naturally go. why would you cut all the flowers off a beautiful tree?
- Above vote was by anonymous editor 66.92.46.119, who has been editing these and a couple of other articles. Barno 13:53, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- No harm, except destroying Wikipedia's very nature. Wikipedia does not exist to serve your promotional desires. -- Cyrius|✎ 01:14, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Wwcarpen "has released" something, so he's alive. No, wait, he's dead. But how many people would notice the difference? Delete. I'm aghast at the WP activities of our friend aghost. -- Hoary 04:15, 2005 May 21 (UTC)
- Delete both and ban the author as a vandal if he tries this sort of thing again. -- Cyrius|✎ 01:14, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- i plan on making more wiki pages for my other projects. im not interested in the world catching up to my ideas, they deserve to be in the wikipedia, when i feel they are ready. i think some serious consideration needs to be given to whether im a vandal or some kind of creationist before my account is deleted. Aghost 15:14, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: You're already making your mark, Aghost. No need to throw "creationism" into the mix. -- Hoary 15:53, 2005 May 22 (UTC)
- it seems to me that you have thrown creationism into the mix. Aghost 18:24, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.