Talk:3D film
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 3D film article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 4 months  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||
| |||||||||||
3d or 4d?[edit]
It's a movie not a photo. It has width height depth and time... isnt that 4d? And arent 2d movies really 3d? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.21.170.64 (talk) 00:18, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- You really got it wrong here. A film is always 2D and will always be 2D. 3D/4D films don't exist and will never exist, unless you create a hologram that features a film. A 3D film will then be 3D, but then the word film would be confusing, as films are meant to be 2D. 4D, as well, does not exist and will never exist. TudorTulok (talk) 17:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
2D[edit]
Can we mention that 3D films don't exist and will never exist, as films are always 2D, as they are on screen, and perhaps explain about the illusion, how is more of a 2D parallax effect, like we had on retro videogames? Thank you TudorTulok (talk) 11:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Singin in the Rain 3D?[edit]
The following quote appears without reference:
"In June 2005, the Mann's Chinese 6 theatre in Hollywood became the first commercial film theatre to be equipped with the Digital 3D format. Both Singin' in the Rain and The Polar Express were tested in the Digital 3D format over the course of several months."
I've looked and looked but can't find sources saying Singin in the Rain was ever converted to 3D and screened that way. Maybe the Wikipedia contributor who added this part first can be contacted to elaborate? Jonathan Sabin (talk) 05:06, 30 July 2023 (UTC)