Talk:FashionTV

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the FashionTV article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television: Stations Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	A production section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section discusses the "behind the scenes" aspects of the production process, award nominations, and insights into the casting and staffing where possible.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Fashion Mid‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

" but it is a free channel no longer ."

Since I can still see it I assume this means it's part of the basic Sky subscription package as opposed to a standalone. This needs to be clarified in the txt. Lee M 01:27, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The entire article is full of weasel-word superlatives, the piece about HD in particular must be pulled straight from a press release. There's very little about the business story of the channel, technical facts about the logistics about running such a widely distributed network, limitations in certain countries on partial nudity, for example, why it is streamed at such poor bitrate compared to fellow channels...I could go on. I found nothing here that I was looking for. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.218.24.149 (talk) 19:38, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tendances[edit]

Since this is an article about something French I can't tell, but I wonder if the word "Tendances" was actually supposed to be "Tendencies" ? Shenme 02:11, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

not sure, too, but we can change it to trends alone - Kaeau

Hmmm... Tendances is the name of a 'show' on FTV - if you are going to translate it then we should really go through wikipedia and translate all proper names (En Recherche du Temps Perdu?). As we're keeping names like Midnight Hot I think this should be changed back - in fact I'm doing it, but I won't feel too hurt if you revert it ;-) Duncan 20:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

modelsobserver.com links[edit]

This and other Wikipedias in other languages have been relentlessly spammed by anonymous IPs based in Israel (where the domain is registered) for many months. It's gotten sufficiently bad as to warrant addition to the spam blacklist and I have removed a number of these links in anticipation of blacklisting:

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#modelsobserver.com (permanent link)
meta:Talk:Spam blacklist#modelsobserver.com (permanent link)

Most, but not all, had been added by the site-owner.

If an established, high-volume editor sees value to the specific link I deleted from this article, please let me know and it can be evaluated for addition to the spam "whitelist"
--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:14, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on FashionTV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on FashionTV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.telaviva.com.br/05/06/2012/canal-fashion-tv-retorna-via-boxbrazil-tv/tl/282197/news.aspx
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080919051856/http://www.barb.co.uk/viewingsummary/monthreports.cfm?report=monthgmulti to http://www.barb.co.uk/viewingsummary/monthreports.cfm?report=monthgmulti

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:11, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]